Policies to Reduce Pollution

The two policies that ar mostly used to strike down taint argon the taxation of the defilement producers (Pigovian tax) and standards-change approaches. The Pigovian taxes are usually generally levied as an excise tax, which go out raise the price of the goods produced. This causes the party to produce less(prenominal)(prenominal) which in turn lowers pollution.The standards-charge approach is to tax the pollution directly. The political relation controls the level of pollution that it thinks is appropriate, and then pull up stakes charge a fine for each unit of measurement that is above the appropriate amount. This is how the standard-charge approach rewards the companies that produce less pollution and punishes the companies that exceed the allotted pollution amount.Unfortunately, standard-charge approaches take overt enable policy makers to control the form quality. The political relation has to estimate how much a company pass on wither their pollution when they are fined. If the regimen drivens a fine to low, the company may determine that it is cheaper to pay the fines rather than get down its pollution. This also exit non give the company an incentive to reduce their pollution level below what the authorities has set as the desired limit.The positive clears to these measures are that our ecosystems are healthy and this also helps the health of the people bread and butter in the local milieu. Air pollution is cognize to cause a great deal of disease in the population, especially respiratory disease. The environments ecosystems will benefit when people and companies lower their use of fossil fuels, this will help to lower greenhouse gases.Taxes and fines alship canal set about some sort of losses involved, both to the companies and to the government applying the fines. When the different taxes are levied, companies will find ways to reduce tolls by either cuts in staffing or outsourcing what they are able to send to alien compan ies. Another cost involves the failure of the government. The different taxes and fines levied on companies are paid over to the government and the government is notorious in their inefficiency in the use of their funds. just about government agencies are overly bureaucratic and uneasy which can create unnecessary regulations that are infeasible to enforce.It is impossible to determine the exact level of pollution reduction needed to produce a healthier living environment. At this point in time, ball club controls the pollution levels until the costs outweigh the benefits of additional controls. This self-confidence isnt always valid. It has been proven, through past actions, which as air quality improves it becomes more difficult to reduce the levels of pollution at a reasonable cost. as yet though society demands a clean environment for health reasons, it is a higher attention depending on income levels.The higher the income level the more of a concern it will be. Those wit h a lower income that are without medical examination insurance are less inclined to bewilder about pollutions that will harm them over time. taint should be reduced so that it will not negatively affect the health of the population or the environment. Unfortunately we also have to weigh the grave of pollution against the cost of job loss and the cost of goods. In the end, as long as the government policies are able to reduce pollution to a level that is socially acceptable they can be viewed a success.